AnsweredAssumed Answered

Pipeline Lift Analysis - Strange Results

Question asked by Mike Armstrong on May 20, 2014
Latest reply on May 26, 2014 by Jared Conway

Like • Show 0 Likes0
Comment • 7

Hi,

First post here so please bear with me.

I am trying to run a pipeline spool lift analysis in Simulation and getting strange results, well strange reaction force results.

It is a 4 point lift and I have assumed that the spoolpeice is supported half the pipe circumference between 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock and lifted vertically. The only applied load is gravity.

The issue is that the resultant force in the Y-direction is greater than the weight of the spoolpeice c/w flanges.

I am missing something?

I have attached the model and simulation result files. Please let me know if these are not required in the future.

Thanks,

Mike

Attachments

Spool Lift Analysis - forum.SLDPRT.zip231.8 KB
Spool Lift Analysis - forum-Stress Analysis.CWR.zip13.8 MB

No one else has this question

Outcomes

7 Replies

Shaun Densberger May 21, 2014 2:51 PM
Mark Correct
Correct Answer
I played around with your model and with mesauring the reaction force. It seems that the coarser the mesh, the more inaccurate (and higher) the reaction loads are. The error goes from ~43% with the coarse mesh to ~0.11% with the fine mesh. It's normal to see slight changes in the calculated reaction forces with an increase in the # of DOF, but I've never seen anything like this. I'm interested in finding out how SW calculates reaction forces within the software.
Like • Show 1 Like1
Actions
- Mike Armstrong @ Shaun Densberger on May 21, 2014 4:49 PM
  Mark Correct
  Correct Answer
  Thanks for the reply,
  
  Well that is strange behavior. I hope someone from Solidworks will be able to elaborate on this.
  
  What mesh size did you take it down too?
  
  Nice to see someone using Mathcad Prime. Are you using a trail version?
  Like • Show 0 Likes0
  Actions
  - Shaun Densberger @ Mike Armstrong on May 21, 2014 5:03 PM
    Mark Correct
    Correct Answer
    I believe that last result ha the slider 7/8ths of the way.
    
    Trial period for MathCAD ended not too long ago, but when the trail period ends the license reverts to MathCAD Prime Express (which is free to use ). Express is a great program even with the reduced functionality.
    Like • Show 0 Likes0
    Actions
    - Mike Armstrong @ Shaun Densberger on May 21, 2014 5:07 PM
      Mark Correct
      Correct Answer
      I believe that last result ha the slider 7/8ths of the way
      I am running a few checks now and will report the difference.
      Trial period for MathCAD ended not too long ago, but when the trail period ends the license reverts to MathCAD Prime Express (which is free to use ). Express is a great program even with the reduced functionality.
      I'm glad you feel that way. I have been an active member of the Mathcad community for years and the criticism of Mathcad Prime is extreme.
      Like • Show 0 Likes0
      Actions
    - Mike Armstrong @ Shaun Densberger on May 21, 2014 5:22 PM
      Mark Correct
      Correct Answer
      I get a similar problem to which you mentioned.
      
      0.2m mesh - resultant force of 2083600N ( This is the smallest mesh size I can take the spline to)
      
      0.15m mesh - resultant force of 227420N
      
      0.1m mesh - resultant force of 259340N
      
      The force does not increase linearly as the mesh is reduced. I cannot understand what Solidworks is doing here.
      
      Please note the resultant force is for the entire model.
      Like • Show 0 Likes0
      Actions
      - Shaun Densberger @ Mike Armstrong on May 21, 2014 5:55 PM
        Mark Correct
        Correct Answer
        This makes me wonder how SW is calculating reaction forces internally. If it's done using the displacement vector field and the stiffness matrix, then there shouldn't be any significant changes in the results as the mesh is modified. However, if the loads are calculated by integrating the stress over the area, then changes can arise due to stress singularities. That being said, I would think that the reaction load would increase as the mesh decreases. Very strange indeed.
        Like • Show 0 Likes0
        Actions
        Jared Conway @ Shaun Densberger on May 26, 2014 9:28 PM
        Mark Correct
        Correct Answer
        Haven't had a chance to check this but is the element size reasonable where the fixed restraints are?
        
        What happens when they are reduced to points instead of surface areas?
        
        What does the out file report the mass to be?
        
        No special options like inertial relief or anything enabled right?
        
        Does the problem happen on simple models? That's is what your reseller will need for reporting the issue.
        Like • Show 0 Likes0
        Actions

Pipeline Lift Analysis - Strange Results

Attachments

Outcomes

Related Content

Recommended Content