AnsweredAssumed Answered

Clarifying the "No Penetration" Constraint

Question asked by Mildred Mattice on Nov 25, 2013
Latest reply on Nov 25, 2013 by Jared Conway

Say there are three objects stacked next to each other: A, B, and C.

 

I apply a load perpendicular to C.

 

Obviously, I don't want A, B, or C to penetrate each other, since they are in contact with one another.

 

To decrease the calculation time, it's okay to just mark object B with the "no penetration", correct? Since A and C are not touching, C cannot go through B, and A cannot go through B; there's no point in having all A, B, and C to have the "no penetration" constraint.

 

If this logic is correct, it's also okay to have A and C with "no penetration", correct (though less efficient)?

Outcomes