AnsweredAssumed Answered


Question asked by Don Van Zile Employee on Mar 12, 2013
Latest reply on Mar 13, 2013 by Glenn Schroeder



A couple of things on the SW World 2013 that made the top list involved improvements/enhancements to mates. For example users would like to see a 'Slot' mate as well as change the default mate type to concentric for and axis and cylinder etc... rather than coincident.


Also, from the pet peeves forum post a while back there was multiple request for a 2nd 'fallback' mate; if 2 planar faces cannot be made coincident then just go to the fallback and solve it parallel.


Is there any other common default mate workflow's users would like to see changed to a more obvious option or a 2nd obvious fallback mate solution if the first one fails?


And lastly, is there any mate types between geometry that we currently don't support that you would like to see supported in the future?



Don Van Zile - Product Definition