This content has been marked as final. Show 10 replies
on 2006 3 08:41 Sam Geragonis wrote:
>....somone unfamiliar designing with Solidworks needs to open the files or make changes to them...
this is the problem...you should not have people unfamiliar with SW screwing with your files...time for doing tutorials, reading SW "Best Practices", and training. If they don't know how to use it, then they shouldn't be doing actual work with it. I'm not a huge fan of in-context design but it certainly does have it's place and shouldn't be written-off entirely. Creating assemblies without mates is absolutely ridiculous and defeats the purpose of solid-modelling. People ignorant of how SW functions should not be the ones dictating how it gets used.
Matt and Dale,
I agree with both of you. There is a time and place for all of these techniques. Those that like to offer up blanket statements that it should not be done, to me, do not have a good understanding of the software. All the techniques have their place, one just needs to know when to use them; and the pluses and minuses of their use.
SW06 SP5 x64, WinXP x64
Dell Precision 380, Pentium D940, 4 Gigs RAM, FX3450
WD Raptors, 1 Gb network connection
on 2006 3 09:47 Dale Dunn wrote:
> I agree except for your comment on multiple contexts. There is a time and place for
> multiple contexts.Tthe user just needs to be careful with them because they can slow
> things down and make circular references even more likely.
That is exactly what I think. But try and convey this to someone.
I'm a one-man shop and I don't use PDMWorks unless the client requires me to. When I feel it is appropriate, I use external references. If your point is that with great power comes great responsibility, then I agree with you. External references require extra cadjockyness to maintain.
In general, I use external references when there is a need for design revision coupled with a cascading dependency on features that are likely to change. That happens in almost every project that I take on.
I most frequently encounter this when designing an enclosure or machined component for an electronic component. Mounting holes, connector cutouts, clearance gaps are easy to manage with external references in the assembly. As the circuit board changes, then my task in updating the final enclosure is automated and efficient.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of best practices that must be followed in order to avoid blips in the relationships. It is too easy to have a really bad day if you don't do things just right.
Gerald Davis CSWP
SW07 SP1.1 Office Professional
2GB / Opteron 175 / FX3400 / ASUS A8N32-SLI
http://www.cosug.com Colorado SolidWorks User Group
if your company is afraid to use solidworks to it's capabilities, why did they bother spending the money on solidworks. the value that solidworks has is that you can create those mates and cuts at the assembly level. instead of just changing one detail, you are going to have more time involved in changing every detail seperatly.
Exactly. This project that I was hired to produce would have taken an extra 6-8 weeks without ex-refs. I also keep them(x-refs) limited to holes or cut-outs that pertain only to this project. Now people not familiar with the Software are breaking all the x-refs because they say I did it wrong. I am a 9 year user of Solidworks and have log over 15,450 hrs of design hours with this software.
It is ridiculous but, it's the truth in how many SW users use or mismanage SW data,.. makes you go,... hmm,.. can we all say, job security!?
I've seen this way too often. I design my parts with Insert/Part, Master model. (because I don't trust Assembly incontext using SW, it's flaky and not a proper external reference workflow, that is coming from a Pro/e background.).
As a consultant, I'll go over Insert/Part before I start, they agree,... but later,.. lo and behold, there becomes a issue with one or more designers who don't like doing any external referencing or the PDM has problems with the references (due to changes)... So, what happens,.. it's usually shot down and I'm asked to not do external references or they break the references..
What a waste of time and efforts. And, IMHO, this is because SW Corp's workflow is flawed and the VAR's teach and/or the students take the path of least resistence because of SW's workflow.
Give the users a better external reference workflow, expand the feature list to ALL features/entities/planes,.. when using Insert/Part and do a better in managing DATASHARING!
I'll add, I have to respect what the client wants/needs, even though I don't agree, I can not fault them,.. doing a complex design with external referencing (especially of they do not know how to manage it) can bring them to their knees!
I am talking about a few matching cut-outs or holes. I have used Solidworks for the past 9 years with great success. I have never been asked to slow down and detail an opening that is the same on 3 panels which stack onto each other. It just seems like wasted time to go and constrain each cutout seperately. With the ex-refs all opennings will update when one changes.
I agree except for your comment on multiple contexts. There is a time and place for multiple contexts.Tthe user just needs to be careful with them because they can slow things down and make circular references even more likely.