**Moderated** stop spamming forum
**Moderated** stop spamming forum
James Dyson wrote:
Is the lack of comments from lack of understanding or lack of interest or both?
It's probably due to the fact that most of us are reluctant to do other people's class work for them.
Ah, let's see. You're a brand new forum member coming here and posing a completely SolidWorks un-related problem out of a text book and want someone to solve it for you, and then you complain when no one bails you out. Maybe since you are smart, you can figure out why no one is doing your homework for you.
You posted this in the "Drawings and Detailing" section. Maybe you could explain why it belongs here?
You aren't Sir James Dyson by any chance are you?
BTW, your error lies in the fact that you are assuming that bubble size changes. You stated you had containers and that the buoyancy was fixed.
Your formula is wrong as well.
paint can open seaengine...needs bouy addon
OMFG you are still peddling this SeaPower perpetual motion crap? Even after having the physics explained to you multiple times in multiple ways on multiple different forums across multiple years?
Move along, folks. This guy is absolutely hopeless.
Josh Brady wrote:
OMFG you are still peddling this SeaPower perpetual motion crap? Even after having the physics explained to you multiple times in multiple ways on multiple different forums across multiple years?
Move along, folks. This guy is absolutely hopeless.
Well, if I had realized it was for a perpetual motion device I'd have been more respectful.
This reminds me of a member we had on an aquarium forum I belong to who insisted that he remembered an aquarium filter in his younger days that used some sort of siphoning action to get started, after which it ran all on its own indefinitely without a power source. He promised to make a working prototype and report back, but oddly enough we never heard back from him.
That would absolutely work James...... I've done a few designs that people said will never ever work, but you yourself has to do the grunt to prove the theory.....
James Dyson wrote:
Is the lack of comments from lack of understanding or lack of interest or both?
It was courtesy. I understood but didn't feel interested enough to embarrass you. Now that you've called us out, let's have at it.
Did you actually do the math on this? Yes or no?
Let's see some basic numbers: energy in vs. energy out.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
James Dyson wrote:
Is the lack of comments from lack of understanding or lack of interest or both?
It was courtesy. I understood but didn't feel interested enough to embarrass you. Now that you've called us out, let's have at it.
Did you actually do the math on this? Yes or no?
Let's see some basic numbers: energy in vs. energy out.
While we're at it, let's pitch the laws of thermodynamics because they don't let it work.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
James Dyson wrote:
Is the lack of comments from lack of understanding or lack of interest or both?
It was courtesy. I understood but didn't feel interested enough to embarrass you. Now that you've called us out, let's have at it.
Did you actually do the math on this? Yes or no?
Let's see some basic numbers: energy in vs. energy out.
He's asking us for the numbers because he cannot produce them. However, the numbers have been shown to him multiple times before. He has already demonstrated an utter lack of ability to comprehend them when spoon-fed at a high-school level. Asking him to actually produce numbers is an exercise in futility. I have seen this at least four times before, and he gets booted and erased from every forum he plugs it on.
Well If anything, Sr. James Dyson would be the one to get it to work.
Even some of his invention really suck.
And the other one blows.
And he says that:
sea water weights 64 lb. per square feet
Since pressure is higher at the bottom of the ocean. Shouldn't sea water get push up into the sky?
Is that Squared??
Workin on it
Yes, apply torque on the pressure so it spin to the sky.
Brilliant.
Modded
I'm going to suggest .. maybe go to a forum which does not have a bunch of grumpy solidworks engineers?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/question-help-please.522744/
Is it about time for the JFK model to make a resurgence again?
Jim Steinmeyer wrote:
Is it about time for the JFK model to make a resurgence again?
c) find the amount of energy the bubble absorbs in the process
Less the the energy we spend reading.
Roland Schwarz wrote:
This would be my go-to.
awh,..can't we all just "believe" in things working for the greater good? 
This one has more energy:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/catastrophic-engine-failure-on-flight-ua328.1000011/
Frederick Law wrote:
This one has more energy:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/catastrophic-engine-failure-on-flight-ua328.1000011/
..amazon,.. damaged delivery?
Is the lack of comments from lack of understanding or lack of interest or both?