I was trying to bring table to parallel plane without success.
As I understand, to do this now it is necessary to recreate table or annotation. Copying and pasting of table or annotation works for placement on a face (not on a plane) only.
Moreover, the original table is even not in the Front plane
Hi,thank you,it is only simple example,I'm trying to master this tool,i need notes for annotation of my complex weldment sketches
Just right mouse button click on table and select Change Annotation View.
Thank you, but please try before suggesting
Can you attach the file shown above?
done
Click on the little cross symbol in the upper left corner of the table. Ctrl + C to copy the table. Click on the desired plane and Ctrl + V to paste. Delete the original table.
Select the table on the original plane, hit "CTRL" + "C" then paste the table onto Plane 1
Unfortunately I can`t get plane liying on the Plane 1 by this way, it is possible only for plate face
I don't understand. Can you please elaborate on what you mean. I apologize for the confusion on my part.
When I paste the table to the Plane 1, the table is not in the Plane 1, it is in parallel plane. If I paste table on the plate face everything is OK.
Recording from the screen of SolidlWorks doesn't show the level of detail needed. Attacked is recording made by Windows Accessories Tool, Step Recorder
My situation
You got me on this one. I'm not sure what to do. I'm out of ideas. Sorry I couldn't help
Hi Igor,
Just a suggestion. It' might be better for you to adapt your workflow to suit the tool you are using. Instead of trying to change the tool to suit your steps. Every time I see one of your posts I get the impression you are focused on the things that don't work. It's like telling everyone the spanner wrench messes up the flats on the nut. Don't use it! It's a bug. It's a simplistic point of view and not true in general. They work well in many applications just not in all. You can use a box wrench instead, or you can avoid overtightening the nut. Or you can use penetrating oil. Or you can head it up. Or you can hit the end with a hammer to loosen the rust. Or you can use a better quality spanner that is thicker and of good quality hardened steel with a proper fit.
All these are can-ideas that help me loosening the nut with a spanner wrench.....and they will get me somewhere. Maybe a change of idea would help you.
Elmar
Hi, Elmar
Of course, now I have to adapt my workflow to all SW bugs because I don`t have other way.
But at the same time:
I want that SW fix all these bugs (I think you don`t want to buy some shoes without bootlaces)
I want that other guys don`t spend a lot of time trying to do what is impossible to do
I want to enhance SW capabilities
It's a second time you commented my post in this way and It`s a second time I`m explaining my position to you.
Just a suggestion. It' might be better for you to don`t read my posts.
Igor
Hi Igor,
We both use this forum for different reasons obviously. That's okay. I can read through comments of all kinds and have the ability to filter out what is helpful to me and what is not. I can do that without "cutting out" ideas (as you suggested) that might not be inline with what I consider helpful.
The interesting part is that I use the same Tool you do. I run into my share of limitations that require workarounds. I simply find it more useful to offer possible solutions than simply pump out high numbers of complains.
And I do think this forum is better served if we think more in terms of "This is how it can work...." contrary to "I can't...It's a bug"
Success comes in many forms, but rarely in the form of perpetual complains.
Best regards,
Elmar
Hi Elmar,
I`m very positive guy, but here It`s not interesting for me to discuss all positive sides of SW, tough sometimes I wrote that SW is the best one
If I know workaround I write about it
If I meet bug I write 'Bug!.....'
If I have idea I write 'Idea!...'
So, I`m very primitive in this , now we understand each other, let`s work.
Elmar Klammer and Igor Fomenko,
I find this discussion fascinating. I see both perspectives Elmar's point is valid from the perspective that this has some type of workaround and Igor just needs to find it. However, Igor's point is that it isn't readily apparent, and so it is a bug.
But, in my view Igor's posts have a direct value to users of the forum. I believe this because I can't count the times I have tried to do something in SW and it doesn't work the way every other tool in SW does and I end up confused, wasting a few minutes or an hour and come to the conclusion it's a bug and I need to find a workaround. So, from that perspective having these bugs listed could save me and others some time and effort.
The bigger question is, how far up on the One and Two list does this particular bug rate for me? Not too high. But, I don't have the same needs as Igor. Something that rates real high for me may not matter to either of you.
Matt Peneguy wrote:
Elmar Klammer and Igor Fomenko,
I find this discussion fascinating. I see both perspectives Elmar's point is valid from the perspective that this has some type of workaround and Igor just needs to find it. However, Igor's point is that it isn't readily apparent, and so it is a bug.
You are not right here (your comment in bold) , if I write Bug!It`s a bug. Look at the picture, please
1. Original table is not on plane, though I placed it on plane (open file for sure).
2. It`s impossible to copy this table to other plane (only to face), so I can place the original table on plane but I can`t do the same for it `s copy, If you copy table to plane it is not on plane. So, sorry, but it is a bug .
Hi Igor,
I only really do tables in drawings so I have no direct answer to what you are asking. But could you not just move the parts closer to the BOM/Top plane? Also, if you used a linear pattern then changed the config on the last instance, you'd have them all fully constrained and aligned without further constraints being required.