Remember the Rockwell Automation Demo? What if someone wanted to make one of those? Could it be accomplished?
I need to be able to pronounce at least half of those things
Why not have a crack at it Steve?
I can't stop laughing. How does this guy pitch the product as if it were real without cracking up.
Reminds me of:
"Turbo Encabulator" the Original - YouTube
Here is the text for the Turbo Encabulator...
For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of automatically synchronizing cardinal grammeters. Such an instrument is the turbo encabulator.
Now basically the only new principle involved is that instead of power being generated by the relative motion of conductors and fluxes, it is produced by the modial interaction of magneto-reluctance and capacitive diractance.
The original machine had a base plate of pre-famulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two spurving bearings were in a direct line with the panametric fan. The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented.
The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-boloid slots of the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a non-reversible tremie pipe to the differential girdle spring on the "up" end of the grammeters.
The turbo-encabulator has now reached a high level of development, and it’s being successfully used in the operation of novertrunnions. Moreover, whenever a forescent skor motion is required, it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm, to reduce sinusoidal repleneration.
Look what happens when this is pasted into Word. It seems some words aren't in the default dictionary.
Outlook has a field day with all those words...
..I heard nothing about it being fault tolerant ...and, I'm sure a few gamers here would say,.. "yeah but,.. can it play Crysis"?
I'd like to see the closed caption version because I couldn't keep up to write down any of those words, except maybe dingle arm...
It sounds like English... but I can't be sure...
Did he say something about the flatulator?
If he is a technical person then it was great work on his part keeping a straight face. On the other hand, if he is an actor with no technical knowledge then this could have been easy for him.
The story is, he's an actor who's done a bunch of technical videos where he hasn't understood any of it. So to get back at everyone he decided to write his own technical video that no one would understand. This is based off the Turbo Encabulator video shared by Matt Peneguy.
Zac Evans wrote: The story is, he's an actor who's done a bunch of technical videos where he hasn't understood any of it. So to get back at everyone he decided to write his own technical video that no one would understand.
Zac Evans wrote:
The story is, he's an actor who's done a bunch of technical videos where he hasn't understood any of it. So to get back at everyone he decided to write his own technical video that no one would understand.
I like his wicked sense of humor!!
The "forescent skor" tripped me up I think he meant "skin" ...... it may also be employed in conjunction with a drawn reciprocation dingle arm...... reducing sinusoidal repleneration... that must be something to reduce sinus hockers..... but, the visual of the "Dingle Arm"
..is this the orginal?
Steve,.. did you see the history on this.... it goes back to 1944!
Turboencabulator - Wikipedia
Yes, most of the people I know remembered (because I had the link to it) the Rockwell version of the Retro-Encabulator and not the original Turbo-Encabulator. Both are fun to watch.
This all reminded me of this old favorite of mine Gobbledygook generator
After all, at base level, it just comes down to synchronised modular hardware. You really can't fail with three-dimensional digital mobility.
And while I've got your attention, don't forget that tomorrow marks the 20th anniversary celebrations of this forums knowledge-based asset alignment.
Probably the production of this machine was outsourced to China. Possibly why we haven't seen many of them in use is they are still working on the manual. Chinese manuals aren't the most useful in regular cases...
Just be patient. If they go forward with their plans to implement millennial translation options, they'll be on-message with parallel logistical concepts before you know it.
My exploratory research points to what's really holding things up. It's that they're shipping the first units to North Korea to forward their plans to implement four-dimensional ICBM contingencies. Fortunately, that solution can only be achieved with ambient strategic hardware and integrated transitional mobility, not the systemised incremental options they seem to be using.
I can make a window to discuss their homogenised strategic flexibility, if you're interested.
Retrieving data ...