Hi,
I attached the file and tree images.
SW and the same analysis in Rhino.
In Rhino is OK and in SW you noticed strange artifacts.
Cubic mapping on a cube.
This is a result that goes against the laws of geometry and good sense.
Can someone explain me why ?
Thanks,
Alessandro
I attached the file and tree images.
SW and the same analysis in Rhino.
In Rhino is OK and in SW you noticed strange artifacts.
Cubic mapping on a cube.
This is a result that goes against the laws of geometry and good sense.
Can someone explain me why ?
Thanks,
Alessandro
sorry, but I'd love to get a response from someone in this forum.
On Italian SolidWorks forum, every day we are attacked by different CAD, once SolidEdge, once Pro-E, one from Inventor and so forth every day.
I use SolidWorks from '97, but certain features like this do not I ever needed and then head.
Today is the turn of Think3 and Rhino.
I would like to contradict those of Think3 and Rhino with technical answers that can silence these evil languages.
Mark Biasotti, you might respond with some words of this difference and help defend SolidWorks.
Thank you,
Alessandro