AnsweredAssumed Answered

Component becomes under defined when controlled by design table

Question asked by Jim Taylor on Apr 5, 2016
Latest reply on Apr 6, 2016 by Jim Taylor

Hello all,

I have two parts in an assembly.  These parts have design tables.  The assembly has a design table.  I want to specify which part goes with which configuration of the assembly by using entries in the design table.


Problem is: When I select one of the assembly configurations, it shows the parts are under-defined ( - ) in that configuration, which in this instance is using the same part part configurations. But these parts are fully defined in the first assembly configuration.  What is changing between the two assembly configurations is the first part in the assembly. It is being swapped out for a different length.  Could that be causing the mate reference to become undefined?


Hope this makes sense!

- Jim