Hi Willem, have you tried adding a local contact set as no penetration rather than setting the Global Component Contact to No Penetration?
Yep, already tried that.
I think the problem is with the rigid bodies also, sometimes when I make them deformable the simulation runs..
I would like to add one more point to what the other two gentlemen mentioned. Adding the local contact set of No Penetration for the simulation study of Shelf - No Screws with the support body treated as rigid, does not solve the stability issue of your simulation. In order to fix the stability issue, it is recommended to use softspring option to stabilize your model. To put further explanation on why do you get the instability error and should use the soft spring, please notice this: You may think that the Shelf body is placed at the top of support and the only load is vertical, why this part is going to be unstable? This argue makes sense in reality, not in numerical simulation. The reason for that could be the type of mesh used here; the tetrahedral elements are used in SW FEA. Having said that, a "very" small force might be places in X or Z direction as transferring the load between all mesh elements. This could be resulted in a "very" small displacement of the component in either of those directions and since no constraint stop the body to move, you will receive the unstable error. Those minor forces will be damped in those directions through those soft springs and helps your model to become stabilized.
Some screenshots are added here for clarification.
Please let me know if it solves your issue and answered your question.
Well thanks! This is a perfect explanation for my problem. Got it in working condition!
Though I think I'll never be able to understand these soft springs and/or inertia relief and the difference between them, and especially the effects on the results...