-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Do it as an assembly. Make your part and put the first hole in and then put the rest of the holes in using a pattern (any kind of pattern will work).
Assemble the Pem fastener into the drive hole of the pattern, then under insert ----> component pattern ---> pattern driven, you select your component to pattern (your Pem Nut) and use the hole pattern as your driving feature (tip...to select it expand the tree for that part and select the pattern).
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Using SW2014 SP5, it is unfortunate that the sketch-driven pattern within a part does not offer the "instances to suppress" option that it does in an assembly. Deleting the additional body at the seed location may be the cleanest method - perhaps add a comment to the delete body feature explaining its need.
Daen
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
An alternative is to create a sketch to drive the pattern.
- Make the hole wizard location sketch visible.
- Create a new sketch on the same plane as the hole wizard sketch
- Set your selection filter to Sketch Points
- Window select all the sketch points in the hole wizard location sketch
- Convert entities
- Either delete the seed location sketch point now, or perform a ctrl-select on it one step back before converting entities
- Remember to set your selection filter back to select all
Now you have a parametric sketch with points at the hole wizard locations except for the seed location. You can use this to drive your sketch driven pattern without the need to delete the seed body. The downside of this method is that changes to the quantity of hole wizard holes does not update in this sketch - it must be done manually.
Daen
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Note with this method, adding or subtracting entities in the hole wizard will not automatically update the number of inserts. and if a point is removed you will get a dangling entity.
And at this point the use of the hole wizard becomes academic. You may as well cut extrude the hole, and in that sketch add sketch points of all other hole locations. You can then sketch pattern the hole from it's own sketch. Plant the seed insert on the original hole and sketch pattern the insert using the same sketch also.
-
-
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Hi Rik,
I've always done it as a part and assembly as you describe, with hole patterns at part level and derived patterns at assembly level. An assembly will allow you to add a BOM to your drawing so the fabricators can quickly see how many of each fastener goes in.
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
I always did this as an assy, but now I want it as a multi-body part.
My customer uses the same partnumber for assy and part. (Which I think this is wrong...)
And so I want to make it in a single part, like a weld-stud in a weldment.
Than you have only 2 files (1 part, 1 dwg) instead of 4 (1 part, 1 assy, 2 dwgs)
I can use a cut-list for counting the fasteners.
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Fair enough Rik, if that works for you. Can you not exclude instances? Otherwise simply do a delete body on the duplicated body.
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
The best way to do it is the assembly method plain and simple. What difference does it make if you have 2 files or 4 files?
-
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Hi Rik, I have the same problem. Have you found a solution?
I also create everything that is welded together as a single part because we buy the welded part from our supplier and I don't want welded nuts appear in my BOM.
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
You could always exclude the nuts from BOM from the assembly. But if you prefer that it is made as a multibody part, it can be done, just with more steps.
Instead of a sketch driven pattern, you would use a linear pattern (assuming linear). Then, assuming you want the pattern driven, you would then link the values to either the hole wizard sketch, or pattern values, depending on how the holes were created.
Since you are using a linear pattern, you can even skip instances like I did in the upper middle.
-
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
- Set up global variables for the pattern distance and number of instances.
- Don't use the sketch pattern for the Hole Wizard. Create a single instance with the Hole Wizard and use the Linear Pattern function to create the additional holes, using the global variable values for distance and number of instances.
- Place the first nut at the same location as the first Hole Wizard hole.
- Create a second linear pattern for the nuts, using the same global variables (making sure to de-select "Features to Pattern" and selecting "Bodies to Pattern" instead).
I realize this isn't perfect, but it should work. If the patterns need to be edited just edit the global variables and both patterns will update to match.
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Thanks Greg and Glenn, I appreciate your advice. I really don't use it very often. It happened few times. I tried sketch driven pattern at first, but there was something wrong with the hole callout when did the drawing, then I ended up doing two separate identical linear patterns. I understand that link parameters is the right way to do it, but I didn't because not worth it at that time.
It isn't a big issue for me, I can cope one way or the other, I'm only saying that shouldn't be difficult for SW software engineers to add in parts this function already available in assemblies.
For sure I'm not going to use an assembly to do a welded part - multibody parts for welments was one of the main reason we choose Solidworks amongst the other CAD software!
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Sergio Monti wrote:
I understand that link parameters is the right way to do it, but I didn't because not worth it at that time.
Not over complicating it is the right way to do it.
-
-
Re: pattern driven component in part
Rik
I would mark Daen Hendrickson's reply as correct. You can, indeed, use a Hole Wizard sketch to pattern the insert bodies, just as you would in an assembly. Sure, I don't know why Solidworks repeats the seed body, but it is simple to delete the extra body. Should we ever adopt a multibody method for sheet metal parts with inserts (we have been thinking about doing just that) then we'd do it that way.
Dwight
