Does any one have problems with ToolBox while using EPDM (SWPDM)?
General question as we seem to have considerable amounts of problems while using Toolbox.
Our EPDM works great.
Is your toolbox controlled (located in) by EPDM? It is preferred setup for a multi-user environment
SW and EPDM 2015... to clarify.
We have been using toolbox for years. In July installed EPDM. EPDM controls our toolbox. 6 Licenses. It went like this
First, the TB worked well with EPDM, but had an issue with being on network with multiple users (super laggy). 4.0 fixed that.
4.0 brought out the inconsistency of custom part no.s not inserting correctly into new models.
5.0 brought the problem with all TB parts not keeping custom info in assemblies.
I've been working with our VAR for some time... If I were here when the decision was made to use TB, I would have said no. The first sign of a poorly put together software is it being a DB that has no capability to truly query.
I agree with using Toolbox. We only use it for the Hole Wizard Feature. All of our fasteners are in a different design folder. My VAR for years has been (not against but) not in favor of using toolbox for various reasons.
The thought behind toolbox is awesome, however its current execution and consistency is almost always under question.
Retrieving data ...